by Rick Lowe
Here's the new twist according to the Speech from The Throne:
"The plight of homeowners in financial distress must be addressed if a stronger economy is to be restored."
"My Government will therefore work with the clearing banks and other institutional lenders to develop a financially sustainable mortgage relief programme aimed at assisting distressed homeowners in saving their homes from foreclosure. Participation in such a programme would be voluntary."
Mr. Hubert Ingraham (FNM), former Prime Minister stated in an interview with The Nassau Guardian that; "it appeared as if the government had scaled back its mortgage relief proposal. He said the plan presented in the Speech from the Throne seemed more practical, unlike the version that was talked about before the PLP won the general election." Read the entire article here…
The "revised" mortgage relief programme seems less dictatorial than what they were suggesting on the campaign trail, but it remains unworkable without adding more to the national debt that the country cannot afford.
What intrigues me about this "Helping people at gunpoint" is that banks are being made the scapegoats.
First, a mortgage is a legitimate contract agreed by both the lender and the borrower, incorporating terms for non-payment that were all agreed to up front before funds were advanced.
Second, the banks are being demonised in this matter as "profiteers" that are cold hearted. The banks are not the only people to "profit" from mortgages now in distress. Why not ask property developers, real estate sales people, lawyers, accountants, the government et al to return the profit/money they made from each sale? And,
Third, if the programme will now be voluntary for banks, one assumes the derogatory noise in the market about banks by the political class will cease?
It merits repeating that it must be incredibly tough for people to lose their homes (and my sister might lose her property so I understand first hand) but to throw reason out of the window in these contractual matters, is whimsical at best.
To paraphrase Penn Jillette, voting for our government to use force to get banks to give money to people who happen to be in arrears with their mortgage is immoral, self-righteous, bullying, laziness.
We will know soon enough if rational thought has slipped in to change the original concept of the mortgage relief plan. But all the promises during the campaign make it very difficult to step away from providing "relief".
Details of the PLP's mortgage plan from their 2012 election "Charter follows:
Continue reading "PLP's mortgage relief plan changed? Did reality set in?" »

Twitter Page










Recent Comments